http://blog.luckydogaudio.com/articles/2007/05/24/woo-remix en-us 40 <p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/GOzkmyDMQIc"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/GOzkmyDMQIc" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p> <p>Dear <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nmvjwOgVoVs">Bubb Rubb</a>,</p> <p>As the connoisseur of "woo", we humbly request your review of <a href="http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=smudgeorama">smudgeorama</a>'s work.</p> <p>Sincerely, </p> <p>Lucky Dog</p> Thu, 24 May 2007 17:09:00 -0500 urn:uuid:8119521b-28de-4587-a869-0ab55e62217b charles http://blog.luckydogaudio.com/articles/2007/05/24/woo-remix Web Goodness <p>First of all, you'll have to recognize that I'm a hair biased, being that I am by most accounts significantly talented and have experienced disproportionately low finacial remuneration; while William Shatner -- a consensus lame-ass dough-boy cracker -- has enjoyed an incomprehensible string of lucrative engagements. That said, his "woooo" and the derivative mix are not entirely without points of interest. Can you give me the number for this "Smudgeorama"? </p> Sat, 26 May 2007 16:39:53 -0500 urn:uuid:52bda10e-1a36-48fe-93f1-b283aafbe907 http://blog.luckydogaudio.com/articles/2007/05/24/woo-remix#comment-850